
|
|
The use of recombinant activated factor VIIa for acute cerebral hemorrhage and hemorrhage in trauma Louise A. Prince, MD FACEP, Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University Many
patients present to the Emergency Department with life threatening
hemorrhage either from trauma or intracerebral bleeding. As our
population matures in age, many patients are also on vitamin-K antagonists
such as wafarin (coumadin) to treat chronic medical illnesses. Treatment
of a life threatening hemorrhage in a patient who is anticoagulated
on these medications in the past has consisted of the use of Vitamin
K and fresh frozen plasma to reverse the effect of the medication.
The onset of action of vitamin K is delayed and the time required
to thaw fresh frozen plasma can be at least 45 minutes. In 2003
the journal Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis (1) published the
first use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) as additional therapy
in seven patients presenting with central nervous system bleeding
emergencies. They demonstrated a rapid reduction in the International
Normalized Ratio (INR) after the administration of rFVIIa. All patients
survived and did not experience any thromboembolic events. They
also tested the use of rFVIIa on blood samples of 25 patients on
stable life long anticoagulation. This testing also demonstrated
similar rapid reduction of the INR value. Following
this publication, the use of rFVIIa in other patients with hemorrhage
despite prior anticoagulation began to emerge. In 2005, The New
England Journal of Medicine published Recombinant Activated
Factor VIIa for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. (2) 399 patients
were randomly assigned to receive either placebo, 40 mcg/kg of rFVIIa,
80 mcg/kg of rFVIIa, or 160 mcg/kg of rFVIIa within one hour after
baseline scan and within three hours after onset of hemorrhage.
Patients who were anticoagulated previously were excluded from this
study. The primary outcome measure was the percent change in the
volume of the intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 hours. Hematoma volume
increased more in the placebo group than in the rFVIIa groups. Mortality
at 90 days was 29 percent for patients who received placebo and
18 percent in the three rFVIIa groups combined. Serious thromboembolic
events occurred in seven percent of the rFVIIa treated patients,
as compared to two percent of those given placebo. Further
research in the area of hemorrhage control in severely injured trauma
patients has also demonstrated some benefit from the use of rFVIIa.
The Journal of Trauma in July of 2005 outlined two studies which
revealed improvement of hemorrhage control when rFVIIa was used
as adjunctive therapy. The first (3), conducted as a placebo-controlled,
double-blind clinical trial showed a reduction of RBC transfusion
as well as a reduction of the need for massive transfusion when
rFVIIa at fairly high doses of 100 or 200 mcg/kg was used. The treatment
groups and the placebo group had similar numbers of thromboembolic
events. The second study (4) was done retrospectively in trauma
patients who received 40 mcg/kg of rFVIIa with an option to repeat
the dose once if needed. The rFVIIa group required fewer RBC transfusions
than the control group. The treatment group also required fewer
platelet and cryoprecipitate transfusions. However, there was no
difference in mortality. The
above literature gave increasing impetus for clinicians to begin
using rFVIIa more liberally in the clinical setting. The US Food
and Drug Administration, however, has only licensed the use of rFVIIa
for bleeding in patients with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors to
factors VIII or IX. In the January 18, 2006 edition of JAMA, an
article entitled Thromboembolic Adverse Events After Use of
Recombinant Human Coagulation Factor VIIa was published (5).
This data was gleaned from the FDAs Adverse Event Reporting
System in the time period between March 25, 1999 and December 31,
2004. There were a total of 431 adverse events reported, of which
168 reports described 185 thromboembolic events. 59 events occurred
in post licensure trials. Unlabeled indications accounted for 151
of the events, most in patients with active bleeding. There were
50 reported deaths with the probable cause being a thromboembolic
event. This article proves to remind the clinician that more research
is needed to establish the safety and efficacy of rFVIIa in patients
without hemophilia. In our institution we are currently looking at using rFVIIa for a number of indications including non-fatal CNS bleeding within six hours of bleeding onset, acute bleeding associated with liver disease or warfarin use, uncontrolled hemorrhage in trauma, uncontrolled surgical hemorrhage despite the use of replacement hemostatic factors, and acute bleeding in patients with hemophilia. The dose varies based on the clinical indication. For CNS bleeding, acute bleeding associated with warfarin, and uncontrolled hemorrhage associated with trauma, we are beginning with the dose of 40 mcg/kg. The dose is higher for surgical hemorrhage and bleeding associated with hemophilia. In
conclusion, there is a growing body of literature demonstrating
the benefit of the use of rFVIIa. However, it must be used cautiously
due to the potential for thromboembolic events and patients should
be screened for their risk for these events. More research into
the safety, efficacy, and clinical indications is needed. Hospitals
should involve pharmacists, clinicians, and hematologists as they
develop their protocols for use and dosages. BIBLIOGRAPHY:
|
|
Home
| About New
York ACEP | Calendar
| Contact Us
| Grants Copyright © 2006 New York ACEP, All Rights Reserved |